Total Wellbeing Diet vs the 5:2 Diet

Fans of intermittent fasting programs - think the 5:2 diet - often find they have success with weight loss, so we take a look at the pros and cons of this kind of diet.

While fasting technically refers to not consuming any food or liquid at all, intermittent ‘fasting’ diets like the 5:2 diet do involve very minimal calorific intake on the fasting days – we’re talking around 2000 kilojoules all day, compared to the daily recommended intake of around 10,000 for men and 8700 for women.  These diets run on the premise that you fast for 2 days of the week and consume as many kilojoules as you like on the non-fasting days.

While 5:2 is the most popular configuration, others find they have more success following a 4:3 or 6:1 ratio of non-fasting to fasting days.

The surprising news is studies are suggesting these diets are successful in achieving weight loss. Even more surprising, Dr Manny Noakes says research is revealing people don’t eat more than they usually would on the non-fasting days – which was what many experts expected to see.

The research is still limited, but Professor Manny Noakes says animal studies have been optimistic. Some of these animal studies have shown intermittent fasting can fend off illnesses including cancer, diabetes, heart disease and neurodegenerative disorders and may improve insulin sensitivity.

Dr Manny Noakes says she herself would not discourage someone following such a diet that was seeing success, though she cautions there is still a lot to learn before it gets the seal of approval.

“If people who are overweight have struggled to lose weight following other diets, and they find this works for them, then that is great. Weight loss, particularly belly fat, has many health benefits - visceral fat is involved in disrupting blood-sugar regulation and is associated with high cholesterol levels. It’s also a risk factor for developing Type 2 diabetes and heart disease.”

On the flipside, Dr Noakes says what we don’t yet know about intermittent fasting is what these diets mean for long-term health.

If the person is simply losing weight because they are effectively cutting a lot of kilojoules from their weekly intake, but they are still eating poorly, then I’d have to argue they still need to address their eating habits for longer term health gain.

She says while restricting your kilojoule intake is a guaranteed way to lose weight, cutting back indiscriminately can lead to an unbalanced, unhealthy diet, and recommends a more balanced approach. “It’s important not to cut key food groups including dairy, grains and cereals – you’ll be missing out on some important nutrients essential for good health.”

She also comments the CSIRO Total Wellbeing Diet is a much easier approach to both long term health and weight loss, because you get optimal nutrients without having to learn the kilojoules of hundreds of different foods.

To summarise the pros and cons: 

On the pro side

• Loss of body fat/ weight for overweight people is of health benefit in general.
• Early research shows contrary to what scientists expected to see, people do not consume more kilojoules on the non-fasting days.
• Intermittent fasting diets seem to be as effective as calorie-restricted diets for weight loss.
• There is early research to suggest it is effective in curbing cravings.
• It provides an easier weight loss plan than standard kilojoule restricting diets – there is no weighing or ‘forbidden’ foods to worry about – on the fasting day, the limited calories will be accounted for very quickly and there are no restrictions on non-fasting days.

On the con side

• Fasting diets don’t change the way you eat – there is no evidence at this stage that suggests people eat healthier food than they did prior to starting the diet. While maintaining a healthy body weight is important for good health; a nutritious diet offers important vitamin and minerals.
• There is limited research on the long-term effectiveness – or any long-term health issues related to intermittent fasting.
• This lack of research means we don’t know who the diet works for and who it might not – for example, what medications or illnesses it may interact badly with.
• Unlike diets that make healthy lifestyle changes - like the Total Wellbeing Diet - fasting diets do not provide advice on how to eat for optimal health, in a way that is sustainable in the long run.